|
|
ResQSoft understands the complex modernization projects that challenge large businesses.
Modernization efforts can be complicated by systems containing multiple applications - often developed in multiple
languages - connected to several databases and/or existing as separate systems altogether. This
often requires project managers to seek several vendors to find tools and/or expertise
for each system. Even then, the results are likely to be completely different, greatly complicating ongoing
maintenance and enhancement of the software.
Through our tool suite, Engineer, ResQSoft provides a single vendor
solution capable of modernizing disparate applications and databases. Our solutions not only allow us to work with
several different languages and bodies of source code at once, we can also modify the
templates
in Engineer to output code specific to a client's requirements. Unlike rigid code generators or translators, our tools can
be taught to write code exactly the way you want it.
Primary Services
- Legacy Code to Java/JSP/HTML - Rapid Redevelopment
- Web Enabled Front-end to Legacy Backend
- Complex Applications Devleoped in Java Architecture
- System-to-System Integration
- Custom Applications Developed on COTS Software Framework
ResQSoft has extensive experience with large, complex projects - succeeding where others
fail by mitigating risk through superior project management. The key is our approach
to handling changing requirements over the life of a project. We also reduce risk by
offering firm-fixed-price contracts for development or redevelopment projects,
which provides IT managers with a clear view of the path ahead. No surprises. ResQSoft
delivers high quality code, on time and on budget.
|
|
Over 1/3 of all large software projects fail…
“The cancellation rate for software projects is directly proportional to the
overall size of the system, and is particularly acute above 10,000 function
points or 1,000,000 source statements. For large systems in excess of
10,000 function points … the cancellation rate approaches 50%.” – Capers
Jones, Assessment and Control of Software Risks
|
|
